The opinions expressed by Entrepreneur members are their own.
In an age where technological progress is accelerating at breakneck speed, it is imperative to ensure that the development of artificial intelligence (AI) remains under control. As AI-based chatbots like ChatGPT become more and more integrated into our daily lives, it’s time to consider the potential legal and ethical implications.
And some did. A recent letter signed by Elon Musk, co-founder of OpenAI, Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple, and over 1,000 other AI experts and donors. calls for a six-month break in training new models. in turn, Time published an article by Eliezer Yudkowsky, founder of the AI Alignment field, calling for a much tougher solution to a permanent global ban and international sanctions on any nation doing AI research.
However, the problem with these proposals is that they require the coordination of multiple stakeholders from a wide variety of companies and government officials. Let me share a more modest suggestion that is much more in line with our existing containment practices for potentially threatening events: legal accountability.
By using legal accountability, we can effectively slow down the development of AI and make sure that these innovations are in line with our values and ethics. We can ensure that the AI companies themselves will promote security and innovate in a way that minimizes the threat they pose to society. We can ensure that AI tools are developed and used ethically and effectively, as I detail in my new book. ChatGPT for Influencers and Content Creators: Unleashing the Potential of Generative AI for Innovative and Efficient Content Creation.
On the subject: AI could replace up to 300 million workers worldwide. But the most dangerous professions are not what you expect.
Legal liability: a vital tool for regulating AI development
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has long been shielded Internet platforms from liability for user-generated content. However, as AI technology becomes more sophisticated, the line between content creators and content hosts is blurring, raising questions about whether AI-powered platforms like ChatGPT should be held on. responsible for the content they produce.
The introduction of legal liability for AI developers will force companies to prioritize ethical considerations, ensuring that their AI products operate within social norms and legal regulations. They will be forced to internalize what economists call negative externalities, that is, the negative side effects of products or business activities that affect other parties. A negative external factor can be loud music from a nightclub that disturbs the neighbors. The threat of legal liability for negative externalities will actually slow down the development of AI, allowing enough time for reflection and the establishment of robust governance structures.
In order to contain the rapid and uncontrolled development of AI, it is important to hold developers and companies accountable for the consequences of their creations. Legal accountability encourages transparency and accountability by forcing developers to prioritize improving AI algorithms, reducing the risk of harmful outcomes, and enforcing regulatory standards.
For example, an AI chatbot that perpetuates hate speech or disinformation can cause significant social harm. A more advanced AI tasked with improving a company’s stock can, if not ethically bound, sabotage its competitors. By holding developers and companies legally accountable, we create a strong incentive for them to invest in technology improvements to avoid these consequences.
In addition, legal liability is much more achievable than a six-month pause, not to mention a permanent pause. This aligns with the way we operate in America: instead of doing government business, we allow innovation but punish the negative consequences of harmful business activity.
Benefits of slowing down AI development
Ensuring ethical AI: By slowing down the development of AI, we can consciously approach the integration of ethical principles in the development and deployment of AI systems. This will reduce the risk of bias, discrimination and other ethical traps that can have serious social consequences.
How to avoid technological unemployment: The rapid development of AI could disrupt labor markets, leading to widespread unemployment. By slowing down the pace of AI development, we are giving labor markets time to adapt and reduce the risk of technological unemployment.
Amplification rules: Regulating AI is a complex task that requires a comprehensive understanding of the technology and its implications. Slowing the development of AI allows for a robust regulatory framework that effectively addresses AI-related issues.
Strengthening public trust: Introducing legal liability for the development of AI can help build public confidence in these technologies. By demonstrating a commitment to transparency, accountability, and ethical considerations, companies can strengthen positive public relations, paving the way for a responsible and sustainable AI-powered future.
Related: Rise of AI: Why lawyers must adapt or risk being left behind
Concrete steps to implement legal liability in AI development
Clarify section 230: Section 230 does not appear to cover AI-generated content. Law outlines the term “information content provider” refers to “any natural or legal person who is wholly or partly responsible for the creation or development of information provided over the Internet or any other interactive computing service.” The definition of “development” of content “in part” remains somewhat ambiguous, but court rulings definite that a platform cannot rely on Section 230 for protection if it provides “pre-filled responses” so that it is “much more than a passive transmitter of information provided by others”. Thus, it is highly likely that court cases will find that AI-generated content will not fall under Section 230: those who want to slow down the development of AI would do well to bring legal cases that would allow the courts to clarify this issue. By clarifying that AI-generated content is not exempt from liability, we create a strong incentive for developers to exercise caution and ensure that their creations meet ethical and legal standards.
Creating AI controls: In the meantime, governments and private organizations should collaborate to create AI governing bodies that develop guidelines, rules, and best practices for AI developers. These bodies can help monitor the development of AI and ensure compliance with established standards. This will help manage legal liability and promote ethical innovation.
Encourage collaboration: Facilitating collaboration between AI developers, regulators and ethicists is vital to building a comprehensive regulatory framework. By working together, stakeholders can develop guidelines that strike a balance between innovation and responsible AI development.
Enlighten the public: Public awareness and understanding of AI technology is essential for effective regulation. By educating the public about the benefits and risks of AI, we can stimulate informed debate and discussion that contribute to the development of a balanced and effective regulatory framework.
Develop liability insurance for AI developers: Insurance companies should offer liability insurance for AI developers, incentivizing them to adopt best practices and comply with established rules. This approach will help mitigate the financial risks associated with potential legal obligations and promote the responsible development of AI.
Related: Elon Musk questions Microsoft decision to fire AI ethics team
Conclusion
The growing prominence of AI technologies such as ChatGPT highlights the urgent need to address the ethical and legal implications of AI development. By using legal liability as a tool to slow AI development, we can create an environment that promotes responsible innovation, prioritizes ethical considerations, and minimizes the risks associated with these new technologies. It is imperative that developers, companies, regulators and the public come together to set a responsible path for AI that protects the interests of humanity and promotes a sustainable and fair future.